摘要（出版方所载原文摘要）
Political scientists have had remarkably little to say about artificial intelligence (AI), perhaps because they are dissuaded by its technical complexity and by current debates about whether AI might emulate, outstrip, or replace individual human intelligence. They ought to consider AI in terms of its relationship with governance. Existing large-scale systems of governance such as markets, bureaucracy, and democracy make complex human relations tractable, albeit with some loss of information. AI’s major political consequences can be considered under two headings. First, we may treat AI as a technology of governance, asking how AI’s capacities to classify information at scale affect markets, bureaucracy, and democracy. Second, we might treat AI as an emerging form of governance in its own right, with its own particular mechanisms of representation and coordination. These two perspectives reveal new questions for political scientists, encouraging them to reconsider the boundaries of their discipline.
出处：AI as Governance，Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 28 (2025), pp. 375–392。
作者：Henry Farrell（美国约翰斯·霍普金斯大学 SAIS）
收录：SSCI 收录（Political Science 类）；据 WoS Journal Info 聚合页核验。
直链：10.1146/annurev-polisci-040723-013245 （DOI 解析；题录经 Crossref API 逐条比对一致）
主题：人工智能的公共治理